Please take a few minutes to tell us if you are happy with the updated Neighbourhood Plan (July 2017 version)
start
 
Before starting please visit the publications page on the HopCroft website to read the updated plan - July 2017 version:
http://croftonhonoroakpark.neighbourhood.space/publications/

Please also find some time to provide a more detailed response on Policy BE3 via the Stickyworld Portal:
https://hopcroftforum.stickyworld.com/room/presentation?roomid=8#page/home

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy G1: Management and Development of Change *

Key Change: Inclusion of statement that ‘New development will be required to: protect and enhance open spaces and contribute to the greening of the Neighbourhood area’.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy G1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy H1: Housing *

Key Change: Included specific reference to new residential development needing to meet the 50% affordable housing target in the Local Development Plan.  Also specific reference to all new residential development needing to reflect the character of the Neighbourhood Area.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy H1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with the addition of Policy H2: Windfall Sites *

Key Change: New Policy. States that development of housing on sites not allocated for residential will be supported where the proposals satisfy the criteria set out in Police H1 and also do not conflict with other policies in the plan, provide a mix of housing types, and include a contribution towards the cost of social infrastructure.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy H2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with the addition of Policy SA1: Land At Whitbread Road *

Key Change: New reference to the need to develop proposals for the site in consultation with local residents and for any proposal to not have an unacceptable impact upon existing residential amenity, public open space or parking.  Also any development would need to provide an overall ‘net gain’ in biodiversity for the site. Other minor text changes to policy.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy SA1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with the deletion of Policy SA2: Land Adjoining Honor Oak Park Station *

Key Change: This policy has been removed from the plan.

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy C1: Protection and Enhancement of Community Facilities: *

Key Change: Dalmain wildlife garden removed as dealt with under GS1 and all Pubs added to the list of community facilities. Also added condition that should loss of an existing community facility be sought, the applicant should first have tried to find an appropriate alternative community use in consultation with the local community.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy C1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy C2: Redevelopment of Sites in Existing Community Use *

Key Change: Changed policy title to: ‘Redevelopment of Sites in Existing Community Use’. Now states that provision of replacement on-site community use must be ‘appropriate’ rather than ‘equivalent’. Also now states that ‘off-site’ provision of community facilities will only be acceptable in ‘exceptional circumstances’, plus a specific reference to the need for a development brief for the Jenner Medical Centre site should proposals for redevelopment come forward.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy C2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change:

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy E1: Local Employment Sites And Enterprise *

Key Change: Policy now includes more control over any new employment uses proposed for the Malham Road LEL e.g. regarding the need to safeguard employment as well as the need to mitigate any negative impacts on surrounding residential areas.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy E1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy E2: Malham Road Area Of Intensification
*

Key Change: Now re-named ‘Malham Road Regeneration Area’. Policy also changed to specify type of employment uses (B1/B2) and requires development to include measures to mitigate impacts on residential amenity and to improve the environmental quality of the area. There is also a requirement for any proposals to be part of an overall masterplan for the area.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy E2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy SA3: Beecroft Mews
*

Key Change: Now called ‘Beecroft Mews Neighbourhood Employment site’. Minor changes to the policy justification.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy SA3, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy NC1: Protection And Enhancement Of Local Neighbourhood Centres
*

Key Change: Changed policy title to ‘Protection and Enhancement of Crofton Park and Honor Oak Park Neighbourhood Centres’. Also alters justification for allowing change of use in these areas to include a demonstration that the unit in question has been vacant for ‘a significant period’ and marketed unsuccessfully. Also now states that the redevelopment of inappropriate uses in neighbourhood centres for more appropriate uses will be supported.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy NC1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy NC2: Protection And Enhancement Of Local Neighbourhood Parades
*

Key Change: Now states that the change of use within Neighbourhood Parades will not be supported if it will result in a reduction of the % of class A1, A2 or A3 across the whole parade, ‘unless the unit has been unsuccessfully marketed for a significant period’

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy NC2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy NC3: Brockley Rise/Stanstead Road Local Improvement Area
*

Key Change: Now includes reference to appropriate meanwhile or temporary uses. Also now includes reference to developments being of high quality design in accordance with policies BE1 and BE2.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy NC3, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy BE1: Design Of New Development
*

Key Change: Includes reference to the need for new development to ‘reinforce local distinctiveness and enhance local social, cultural and heritage assets’. Also now includes ‘high quality contemporary architectural design’ plus explains how development can promote the principles of healthy, sustainable design.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy BE1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy BE2: Extensions And Alterations To Existing Buildings
*

Key Change: Clarified intent with statement that states the need to repair / restore heritage features rather than replaced wherever feasible where this would protect and enhance local character. Other minor clarifications made to the policy wording.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy BE2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy GS1: Protecting Green Space
*

Key Change: Added sentence stating that: ‘small structures which are ancillary to and will enhance use of these sites as a local green space may be permitted’.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy GS1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy GS2: Greening The Neighbourhood
*

Key Change: Now includes reference to new development needing to ensure that sufficient green space is included to meet future needs and anticipate climate change. Also now includes the need to give consideration to features such as ‘green roofs and walls’.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy GS2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy GS3: Designation Of Green Chain Walk
*

Key Change: New policy title is: ‘Three Peaks Green Walk’ and the need to improve connections with the South east London Green Chain Walk. Also requests that development addresses the opportunities to improve access to green spaces and key green walk thoroughfares like Eddystone Road Footbridge

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy GS3, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy GS4: Protection Of Local Sites Of Conservation Interest And Designation Of Local Nature Reserves
*

Key Change: Now called “Protection of Sites of Nature Conservation Importance” making reference to all types of SINCS (i.e. Nature Reserves/Wildlife Gardens). Also identifies the New Cross and Forest Hill SINC specifically as a Nature Improvement Area and recommends that the council and the GLA consider an MOL – metropolitan open land designation.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy GS4, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy T1: Enhancement Of Brockley Corridor
*

Key Change: Now includes reference to the need to improve the appearance of ‘gateways’ at Crofton Park and Brockley Rise/Stanstead Road.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy T1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy T2: Pedestrians
*

Key Change: Now includes reference to the requirement for new development to improve pedestrian access in the Neighbourhood Plan area e.g. through setting buildings back to allow wider footways and to contribute to the improvement of the ‘Three Peaks Walk’

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy T2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy T3: Cyclists
*

Key Change: Minor word changes to clarify word intent, making clear that development should contribute to improve facilities for cyclists in the Neighbourhood Plan area.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy T3, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy T4: Public Transport
*

Key Change: Brockley Corridor added as one of the locations where improvements to public transport facilities will be supported.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy T4, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy HW1: Managing Flood Risk
*

Key Change: Now includes reference for new development to include provision for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) unless there are “practical or viability reasons for not doing so” and “for SUDS to provide habitat, water quality and amenity benefits in addition to attenuation”.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy HW1, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I am happy with changes made to Policy HW2: Improving Air Quality
*

Key Change: Now includes Stanstead Road as a location where measures to improve air quality will be required to be included in any proposed works or development. Also states support for any measures to improve facilities for walking, cycling or use of public transport in order to reduce car journeys.

 
Since you disagree with changes to Policy HW2, please tell us how you would like the policy wording to change: *

 
I would be happy to vote 'Yes' to accept the Neighbourhood Plan as a statutory planning document at the referendum (planned for late 2017/early 2018


 
Since you voted no, please tell us why / which part of the plan stops you from doing so *

 
Which part of the neighbourhood are you from? *


 
Would you describe yourself as:


 
Which age bracket to you fall into


Thank you very much for taking the time to complete this survey.

The work on policy ‘BE3: Areas of Special Local Character'. We would like to give you the opportunity to comment further on this via our Stickyworld portal.

This is because further evidence has come through via a Heritage and Character assessment undertaken by AECOM (via technical support) and a study putting forward nine different areas.

We want to give you the opportunity to review these on the Stickyworld Portal:  https://hopcroftforum.stickyworld.com/room/presentation?roomid=8#page/home

When you find a spare moment please vist the site and review these and/or put forward other streets/collection of streets which possess sufficient architectural, townscape and environmental quality to make them of significant local value to be designated as “areas of special local character”.


again
Powered by Typeform
Powered by Typeform